www.bna.com Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal
HomeIndexTable of CasesFeedbackwww.bna.com

Printable version (PDF) 

INDEX
Vol. 80, Nos. 1965-1988, pp. 1-854, and Vol. 81, Nos. 1989-2000, pp. 1-414
May 7, 2010 -- Jan. 28, 2011

A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

    DAMAGES
      – Copyrights
        – – Compact discs, music industry group not direct counterfeiting victim, restitution order reversed (Cal. Ct. App.), 80:813
        – – File sharing statutory award excessive (D. Mass.), 80:330; BNA Insights, 80:662
        – – Injury from infringement not required for statutory damages award (U.S., rev den), 80:104
        – – Kazaa system file sharing, statutory award of $1.5 million (D. Minn.), 81:54
        – – Record albums, statutory infringement award unavailable for each song (2d Cir.), 80:18; (U.S., rev sought), 80:829; (rev den), 81:155
      – Patents
        – – False marking, fine set at highest sale price of product (S.D. Tex.), 80:19
        – – Judges at symposium discuss compensatory damages issues, 80:88
        – – Legislative reform of infringement awards, experts debate need for, 81:337
        – – Royalty determinations for lump-sum infringement award (Fed. Cir.), 80:264
        – – Software
      – Right of publicity
        – – Discovery of defendant's sales data (1st Cir.), 81:148
      – Trademarks
        – – Increased award without finding of intentional infringement or actual confusion (U.S., rev den), 81:344
        – – “Masters and Johnson” service mark, actual confusion not required in willful infringement suit (8th Cir.), 81:310
        – – Profits award, infringement suit (U.S., rev sought), 81:109; (rev den), 81:344
    DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS
      – Patent owner and licensee must be joined in accused infringer's suit (Fed. Cir.), 81:83
      – Trademark infringement, impact of substantial controversy standard, BNA Insights, 80:793
    DEFENSES
      – Fair use
      – Inequitable conduct
      – Innocent infringer defense rejected in music file sharing suit (U.S., rev sought), 80:521; (brief sought), 80:738; expert comments, 80:784; (rev den, Alito dissent), 81:140
      – Naked licensing defense to alleged infringement of Freecycle Network marks (9th Cir.), 81:142
      – Patent exhaustion doctrine
        – – Law professors debate liability issues, 81:47
        – – Single-use cameras, importation of refurbished products (Fed. Cir.), 80:196; (U.S., rev sought), 81:28; (rev den), 81:232
      – Unclean hands defense to trademark infringement liability (D. Utah), 81:254
    DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT (DMCA)
      – Circumvention ban, exemptions announced, 80:417; text, 80:446
      – Class notes publisher use of professor's lecture notes and textbooks (N.D. Fla.), 81:149
      – “Dongle” bypass to activate software not circumvention violation (5th Cir.), 80:433; modified opinion issued, 80:764
      – Game software, circumvention of access controls (9th Cir.), 81:251
      – General knowledge of infringing videos posted by users, YouTube lacked duty to take down (S.D.N.Y.), 80:289
      – Misrepresentation liability, copyright infringement notices sent to eBay (E.D. Cal.), 81:90; takedown notices barred by preliminary injunction, 81:293
      – Safe harbor, conferees discuss, 80:63
      – Takedown notices
        – – Google to expedite action on requests, 81:173
        – – Political speech, study of impact on, 80:786
      – YouTube video of children dancing to Prince song, mother's e-mail not shielded from discovery (N.D. Cal.), 81:114
    DILUTION
      – Famousness of mark, consumer survey evidence, BNA Insights, 80:402
      – Malicious prosecution of claims on behalf of Princess Diana's estate (Cal. Ct. App.), 80:59
      – Microsoft mark, contributory liability (W.D. Wash.), 81:346
      – Victoria's Secret famous mark tarnished by adult business' mark (6th Cir.), 80:121; conferees discuss, 80:691; (U.S., rev sought), 81:109; (rev den), 81:344
      – “Visa” credit card mark diluted by “eVisa” mark (9th Cir.), 80:337
    DISCOVERY
      – Attorney-client privilege
        – – DMCA suit over YouTube video of children dancing to Prince song, mother's e-mail not shielded (N.D. Cal.), 81:114
        – – In-house counsel status as inactive bar member (S.D.N.Y.), 80:356
      – Deposition testimony insufficient contacts with forum for personal jurisdiction (S.D. Ind.), 80:843
      – Document dump, Amazon violation of trademark suit discovery order sanctioned (T.T.A.B.), 80:657
      – Expedited discovery, internet subscribers accused of unauthorized access to website (S.D. Cal.), 81:89
      – Identity of copyright infringement defendant accused of music file sharing (2d Cir.), 80:17
      – Right of publicity damage award based on defendant's sales data (1st Cir.), 81:148
      – Trade secret theft, documents sought for use in German lawsuit (7th Cir.), 81:372
    DMCA
    DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
      – Generic drugs, Mucinex brand expectorant, patent infringement (Fed. Cir.), 80:504
      – VCR patent infringement upheld, U.S. law governs successor liability (Fed. Cir.), 80:641
    DOMAIN NAMES
      – “Advertising.com,” AOL mark not protectable (9th Cir.), 80:484
      – Auto brokerage service, fair use of “Lexus” mark (9th Cir.), 80:336
      – Bankruptcy, sale of failed retailers' domain names, BNA Insights, 80:585
      – “Borescopesus.com” not protectable mark (M.D. Tenn.), 80:485
      – Cybersquatting
      – Generic top-level domains, ICANN Board delays vote on proposed expansion, 81:225
      – Seizure of domain names
        – – Anti-counterfeiting seizure conducted by ICE, 81:139
        – – Criminal copyright infringement (S.D.N.Y.), 80:343
    DRUGS

Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com
1801 S. Bell Street, Arlington, VA 22202 - Phone: 1-800-372-1033

Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.