![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Vol. 34, Nos. 1-26, pp. 1-764; Vol. 35, Nos. 1-23, pp. 1-676 Jan. 6 -- Dec. 29, 2010 A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
– Educational institutions
– – Ariz. college administrators entitled, professor who sent racially-charged emails not disciplined (9th Cir.), 34:619
– – Faculty member's claim in reply brief deemed abandoned (5th Cir.), 34:120 – Government officials
– – Consent decree does not shield city officials from officers' equal protection promotion claims, no qualified immunity (7th Cir.), 35:332
– – Discovery of affirmative defenses, work product doctrine (Ohio Ct. App.), 35:577 – – District attorney with no authority over worker entitled (10th Cir.), 34:153 – – Due process violation in firing of police commissioner, mayor's immunity (4th Cir.), 34:15
– – Retaliation, pre-Burlington standard applied to past incidents, reversal of immunity for officers (11th Cir.), 34:412
– – Sheriff's individual immunity, deputy sexually assaulted females (8th Cir.), 34:239 Contact the Webmaster at webmaster@bna.com Copyright © The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. |